The small-scale model measured 53 cm in length, 75 cm in width, and 40 cm in height, representing a full-scale house of 8 meters in length, 11.2 meters in width, and 6 meters in height. Simulated smoke could enter through a skylight with dimensions of 24 cm by 8 cm in the model, representing 3.6 meters by 1.2 meters in full scale.
The smoke dispersion was tested on small-scale homes with different roof angles of 0 degrees, 15 degrees, 30 degrees, 45 degrees, and 60 degrees. At each angle, three different incoming wind velocities were tested. The researchers tested the model under different heat release rates (HRR) with winds blowing at 5.16 meters per second on a 0-degree roof.
โIn comparing the results for various rooftop angles, the 15-degree rooftop angle is considered hazardous, while the 45-degree and 60-degree rooftop angles offer the highest level of safety for fire prevention,โ the researchers explained. โFor the 60-degree rooftop, residents have approximately 12 minutes to evacuate, while for other rooftops (less than 45 degrees), residents have only about four minutes.โ
The scientists said that while residents should move lower during building fires to reduce the risk of smoke inhalation, that may not be effective in rooftop PV fires due to โthe swift and uniform smoke infiltration throughout the chamber.โ
The scientists also found that lowering the wind velocity increased smoke infiltration into the building. In addition, higher HRR was found to lead to stronger smoke infiltration.
โDry green rooftops have a maximum of 200 kW/m2 HRR, while wood rooftops have a maximum of 300 kW/m2 HRR, respectively,โ they said. โRooftop PV fires have a larger HRR (max 500 kW/m2), posing a higher risk.โ
They presented their results in โWind-driven smoke dispersion in rooftop photovoltaic fires: An experimental investigation with helium smoke,โ which was recently published in the Journal of Building Engineering. The research was conducted by scientists from Japanโs Niigata Institute of Technology, as well as Canadaโs University of Sherbrooke and Concordia University.
โRooftop PV fires carry a higher risk than regular roof fires due to the relatively higher HRR and smoke dispersion,โ the scientists concluded. โThis indicates that when designing and selecting PV systems, the HRR value of the PV should be considered in terms of fire safety concerns.โ
Author: Lior Kahana
This article was originally published inย pv magazineย and is republished with permission.