Kiwa PVEL scorecard shows TOPCon tech is more vulnerable than PERC

Google+ Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr +

 

Last week, solar panel manufacturers JinkoSolar and Trina Solar reported that field tests show that tunnel oxide passivated contact (TOPCon) solar modules outperform p-type rear contact PV modules in monthly power generation. These studies were conducted by the manufacturers individually, and in the case of Jinko Solar, the results were confirmed by German agency TรœV Nord.

While the data from a generation perspective is encouraging, the results of this year’s Kiwa PVEL scorecard have shown that the technology is more vulnerable. Researchers at the University of New South Wales in Australia have also recently published the results of new research showing the vulnerability of TOPCon solar cells to contact corrosion, as previously reported by pv magazine in 2023.

In the case of the tests carried out by Kiwa PVEL, the results depend largely on the type of bills of materials (BOM) used.

โ€œThis yearโ€™s results have surprised us,โ€ Asier Ukar, managing director of Kiwa PI Berlin in Spain, told pv magazine. In particular, less than 6% of the 388 models tested were top performers in all reliability tests (TC, DH, MSS, HSS, PID and LID+LETID); and 66% of module manufacturers experienced at least one failure in the tests. โ€œThe failure rate at BOM level also increased to 41%, the highest ever,โ€ he explained. PV modules with the same model type can be manufactured from completely different BOMs, and these changes in PV module components can have a major impact on reliability and performance. On the other hand, โ€œindustry certification tests according to standard regulations are often not strict enough to identify these potential problems,โ€ Ukar added.

Image: Kiwa PVEL

For example, the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) test for Thermal Cycling is 200 cycles in a climatic chamber, while the Kiwa PVEL test is 600 cycles. This test models the behaviour under hot-cold thermal cycles, and the requirement to pass the test is that the module degrades less than 2%, and 84% of the modules tested passed the test; 11 manufacturers suffered a failure in this test. โ€œThe average degradation rate for PERC and TOPCon was 0.6% and 0.7%, respectively, but 5 TOPCon BOMs registered a power degradation failure compared to only 1 PERC BOM,โ€ Ukar said.

Image: Kiwa PVEL

Another test, Damp Heat, subjects the panels to moist heat in a climate chamber. Kiwa PI Berlin subjects them to 2,000 hours โ€“ compared to 1,000 for the IEC โ€“ and the requirement to pass the test is that the module degrades less than 2%. โ€œIn this case, 31% of the BOMs tested failed the test, and TOPCon is more affected than PERC,โ€ Ukar explained.

The mechanical stress, hail, Potential Induced Degradation (PID) and LID โ€“ LeTID tests generally yielded good results, but problems were observed in the UV-induced degradation (UVID) tests: โ€œThe power loss after 120 kWh/m2 of UVID ranged from 0.6% to 16.6%. While HJT is affected and PERC degrades more than expected, TOPCon suffers much more,โ€ he added.

Image: Kiwa PVEL

Everything points to TOPCon being the dominant technology in the next five years and, as with every technological advancement introduced by the sector, this improvement also comes with certain risks and challenges that must be understood and addressed.

โ€œOne of the main objectives in the race to deploy this technology in a way that meets expectations is to focus on its long-term durability, that is, how this technology behaves under the influence of environmental factors such as humidity or UV radiation,โ€ Ukar stated. This approach brings with it the need to include extended-duration tests in the prequalification processes of manufacturers and their models, as well as adapting laboratory testing procedures with tests adapted to the risks that TOPCon introduces. โ€œThe good news is that both the tools and the knowledge exist and are at the service of the industry,โ€ he concluded.

Author: Pilar Sรกnchez Molina

This article was originally published in pv magazine and is republished with permission.

Share.

Leave A Reply

About Author

Green Building Africa promotes the need for net carbon zero buildings and cities in Africa. We are fiercely independent and encourage outlying thinkers to contribute to the #netcarbonzero movement. Climate change is upon us and now is the time to react in a more diverse and broader approach to sustainability in the built environment. We challenge architects, property developers, urban planners, renewable energy professionals and green building specialists. We also challenge the funding houses and regulators and the role they play in facilitating investment into green projects. Lastly, we explore and investigate new technology and real-time data to speed up the journey in realising a net carbon zero environment for our children.

Copyright Green Building Africa 2024.