Concern over South Africa’s weak Carbon Tax

  • The African Climate Reality Project (ACRP) welcomes the implementation of a carbon tax in South Africa as of Saturday, 1 June 2019 but fears it is destined to fail to drive a low carbon economy.

Signing the Carbon Tax Act on 23 May 2019 was one of the first actions taken by President Cyril Ramaphosa upon his election. We hope it bodes well for the country’s urgently needed efforts to curb its heat-trapping greenhouse gas emissions writes Noelle Garcin, project manager for Action 24.

The carbon tax is a fiscal instrument that puts a price on greenhouse gases emitted through the production of goods and services. It serves to internalise negative externalities, in other words, the social and environmental costs of carbon. As such, it is a critical tool in the fight against climate change – the greatest existential threat of our time, and no longer a remote one: many South Africans in rural areas and cities from Limpopo to the Western Cape are already affected.

The 2018 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPPC) Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5°C states that we have 11 years to radically reduce our heat-trapping emissions if we want to have the slightest chance of keeping global warming below a 2°C increase.

Even then, South Africa – a confirmed climate hotspot – will warm at twice as much as the global average. A frightening reality for our country: “There is no certainty that adaptation to a 4°C world is possible,” warns the World Bank. This is why an effective and just carbon tax is so important.

The ACRP welcomes the speedy implementation of this measure and the fact that carbon tax will not impact the price of electricity in the first implementation phase (2019-2022). The poor cannot afford higher electricity prices and its ripple effects.

Reducing Eskom’s carbon emissions can be managed through the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP), a policy instrument, provided that it brings an even greater share of renewable energy into the electricity supply mix than envisaged in the latest updated draft from 2018.

However, ACRP highlights that during the first phase, the carbon tax is destined to fail to drive the much-needed rapid shift to a low carbon economy. The reasons are simple and presented below.

Until December 2022, the tax rate is set at R120 per ton of CO2 equivalent (tCO2e) of the greenhouse gas emissions, with annual increases as per consumer price inflation. Yet research by the High-Level Commission on Carbon Prices indicated in 2017 that a minimum carbon price should be in the range of R550 – R1,110 per tCO2e by 2020, if it is to be effective to achieve the Paris Agreement’s temperature increase target of “well below 2 degrees Celsius”.

In addition, the number and scale of tax rebates applicable during the next two years undermine the effectiveness of the carbon tax system by offering significant rebates (from 60% to 95%) to most of the industries that are in fact the heaviest carbon emitters.

The low tax rate and excessive rebates in the carbon tax as implemented until 2022 will render it ineffective at leveraging a reorientation of the whole economy in a lower carbon direction, in a timeframe that is consistent with the urgency of climate change and South Africa’s commitments under the Paris Agreement.

For a fair contribution to keeping global warming within “manageable” levels, South Africa needs to halve its carbon emissions in the next six years … Unfortunately, in its current form, the carbon tax will not help us achieve that.

For an effective and just carbon tax that serves the interests of all our fellow citizens and the planet, we must rather make the carbon tax more stringent to effectively put the social cost of carbon onto the emitters rather than the poor, while introducing measures that soften the blow for the economically marginalised, such as reducing the VAT rate which has a disproportionate impact on the poor, or conditioning rebates to demonstrated increased employment.

As part of its European Union co-funded Action 24 initiative to foster public participation in the shaping of environmental and climate legislation, ACRP submitted comments along those lines to Parliament and the National Council of Provinces, as they reviewed of the Carbon Tax legislation before it was passed in March this year.

Unfortunately, the legislator seems to have bought into the misguided idea that we need trade-offs between environmental sustainability and economic growth – when in fact they walk hand-in-hand.

Another reason for concern is the lack of detail from the government on the second phase of the tax, although we have been told that it will be strengthened over time. This means that all concerned citizens should call now for an effective and just carbon tax post-2022.

Author: GBA News Desk/ESI-Africa Contributor

This article was originally published on ESI Africa and is republished with permission with minor editorial changes.

Leave A Reply

About Author

Green Building Africa promotes the need for net carbon zero buildings and cities in Africa. We are fiercely independent and encourage outlying thinkers to contribute to the #netcarbonzero movement. Climate change is upon us and now is the time to react in a more diverse and broader approach to sustainability in the built environment. We challenge architects, property developers, urban planners, renewable energy professionals and green building specialists. We also challenge the funding houses and regulators and the role they play in facilitating investment into green projects. Lastly, we explore and investigate new technology and real-time data to speed up the journey in realising a net carbon zero environment for our children.

Receive the week’s most popular stories in your inbox every Saturday morning