Challenges of dismantling abandoned wind and solar farms

Google+ Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr +

 

  • When renewable assets near the end of their operational life, project owners can decommission, repower, renew, operate to failure, or abandon on-site equipment.ย 
  • In a largely decarbonized future, large-scale solar could occupy 0.5% to 2.8% of land in the European Union, but multipurpose land use could potentially ease its footprint.

Despite this flexibility, University of Granada researchers analyzed the landscape legacy of abandoned wind and solar projects. The have determined that their physical footprint can alter land use and aesthetics over the long term.

Reviewing waste management and decommissioning research, they found growing interest in the field, but major gaps in how regulations address โ€“ or fail to address โ€“ these challenges.

โ€œIt is crucial that we know whether adequate regulations exist to address the lifespan of renewable energy infrastructure as we think about how to recycle the landscapes they occupied,โ€ said the researchers in โ€œAbandoning renewable energy projects in Europe and South America: An emerging consideration in the recycling of energy landscapes,โ€ recently published in Energy for Sustainable Development.ย  โ€œSo far, there are no reliable estimates of abandoned renewable installations in Europe and South America; however, due to the increasing intensity of renewable deployment, thousands of abandoned turbines and solar panels may soon accumulate around the world and generate new conflicts over land use.โ€

Abandoned wind and solar farms result from regulatory gaps in decommissioning policies, especially for projects left idle before reaching the end of their operational life, the researchers found. โ€œThe need to improve these regulations will be crucial to ensure the restoration and recycling of renewable energy landscapes in the future,โ€ they explained.

The team examined cases where required decommissioning has not occurred, including wind farms in Keyenberg, Germany, and Jepรญrachi, Colombia, and the Nรบรฑez de Balboa solar plant in Spain.

The authorities in Keyenberg halted the wind farmโ€™s dismantling to allow for an open-cast mine after activists argued it undermined climate goals. In Jepรญrachi, the company awaits an environmental authorityโ€™s formal order to begin dismantling. In Nรบรฑez de Balboa, a court ruled the developer must return 500 hectares of expropriated land but is not required to restore the landscape. The solar plant remains operational as the developer appeals.

Abandoned projects

The study analyzed nine renewable projects โ€“ eight wind and one solar โ€“ across Italy, Spain, Venezuela, and Argentina.

Three plants were abandoned before operation, while six were left during operation. Of those, three were deactivated, and three still feed electricity into the grid. Researchers identified poor planning, mismanagement, economic and technological issues, and competing interests as key reasons for abandonment.

Authorities blocked Spainโ€™s Vinapolรณ solar park from injecting power because it exceeded the agreed capacity. The owners are negotiating its sale, but neither the City Council nor the Consell has ordered its dismantling since 2011.

Italyโ€™s Butera wind farm was abandoned due to the city councilโ€™s failure to expropriate land for substations. Venezuelaโ€™s La Guajira wind farm, budgeted at $225 million, began construction in 2011 but was never completed.

Insufficient coordination and planning prevented the project from connecting to the grid, leaving its interconnection infrastructure and substations unfinished. In 2018, the then-minister of electric energy attempted to restart construction but found that vandals had destroyed 80% of the wind farmโ€™s โ€œstrategic material.โ€ Looters dismantled the rotors, stripped the turbines, and sold two fallen machines as scrap.

Three other wind farms โ€“ Montaรฑa Mina, Monte Arci, and Jorge Romanutti โ€“ were abandoned during operation.

Montaรฑa Mina in San Bartolomรฉ (Canary Islands) began operating in 1992 but was abandoned in 2014 after its managing company went bankrupt. By 2017, it was inoperative, with obsolete and damaged turbines. Local authorities blocked a 2018 repowering attempt, arguing the site should be restored to its natural state. Despite three requests for dismantling, work has stalled due to high costs and disputes over responsibility.

Italyโ€™s Monte Arci wind farm, with 34 turbines, opened in 2000 but operated for only a few months before being decommissioned. The turbines quickly became obsolete and were left to decay. Authorities sent multiple warnings and an eviction order, but only partial cleanup began in 2010. After more than two decades, dismantling finally started in 2020, though access roads still cut through the Natural Park, and soil contamination remains unverified.

Lack of regulation

Wind farm decommissioning in Europe lags expectations, largely due to weak laws holding owners, companies, and developers accountable. Complete removal depends on legal agreements that are often missing.

The researchers found that none of the affected countries had regulations at the time of project approval requiring full environmental and waste management restoration after abandonment or the end of operational life.

France, the United Kingdom, Germany, and Italy have since introduced decommissioning rules, including financial guarantees, but they do not specify liability if a wind farm shuts down before its technical lifespan ends. Denmark is the only country mandating that decommissioning must begin within a year of shutdown.

The scientists called for stronger measures to ensure full site restoration after decommissioning.

โ€œIn this regard, we recommend that policy and decision makers consider adopting regulatory frameworks similar to those in countries such as Denmark, where decommissioning planning is mandatory even before projects reach the end of their technical operational phase,โ€ they concluded. โ€œSince every project subject to environmental assessment must include a decommissioning phase, the issue is not the lack of importance of this phase, but rather that current regulations do not require this phase to be implemented. It is therefore crucial that policies emphasize the establishment of regulations and guarantees that cover the entire life cycle of projects to ensure their true sustainability.

Author: Pilar Sรกnchez Molina

This article was originally published in pv magazine and is republished with permission.

Share.

Leave A Reply

About Author

Green Building Africa promotes the need for net carbon zero buildings and cities in Africa. We are fiercely independent and encourage outlying thinkers to contribute to the #netcarbonzero movement. Climate change is upon us and now is the time to react in a more diverse and broader approach to sustainability in the built environment. We challenge architects, property developers, urban planners, renewable energy professionals and green building specialists. We also challenge the funding houses and regulators and the role they play in facilitating investment into green projects. Lastly, we explore and investigate new technology and real-time data to speed up the journey in realising a net carbon zero environment for our children.

Copyright Green Building Africa 2024.