OUTA calls Eskom’s application for a 66% price hike over three years excessive

Google+ Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr +
  • The Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse (OUTA) in South Africa made a submission to the National Energy Regulator of SA (Nersa) opposing Eskom’s pricing application, saying this would result in a 66% price hike over three years.

“South Africa cannot afford this,” says Estienne Ruthnam, OUTA Senior Project Manager.

“Our submission addresses significant concerns regarding Eskom’s proposed electricity price increases over the next three years, from 2025 to 2027. OUTA’s core argument is that Eskom’s application for a 66% revenue and price increase—proposed at 36.15% for 2025, 11.81% for 2026, and 9.1% for 2027—is excessive and will have adverse impacts on South Africa’s economy, customers, and society.”

Related news: Unit 6 at Eskom’s Kriel coal power plant catches fire

OUTA’s submission notes that these increases come on the back of massive revenue and price increases for Eskom over the past 15 years, and that Eskom focuses on ensuring cost reflectivity by increasing tariffs and revenue, rather than by reducing costs and improving performance and efficiency.

OUTA’s submission opposing Eskom’s price application highlights issues such as Eskom’s insufficient focus on cost-cutting, outdated economic studies, and under-utilised cost-reduction strategies.

OUTA’s key recommendations include:

  1. Rejecting the proposed increases: OUTA believes the requested increases are too high and argues that these will exacerbate the economic burden, especially since they exceed inflation.
  2. Focusing on cost reflectivity and operational efficiency: OUTA urges Nersa to push Eskom towards cost reductions in staffing, maintenance, and energy procurement instead of passing rising costs onto consumers.
  3. Improving transparency and accountability: OUTA suggests that Eskom must adopt a clearer, more transparent approach to budgeting for assets and managing operational costs, as well as address issues related to asset valuation and depreciation.
  4. Commissioning independent studies: OUTA proposes that Nersa should initiate independent studies on Eskom’s socio-economic impact, staffing levels, remuneration, and regulatory asset valuation to provide a balanced view of Eskom’s costs.
  5. Transitioning to clean energy: The submission emphasises the need for Eskom to shift more rapidly toward affordable, sustainable energy sources, and avoid reliance on fossil fuels.
  6. Supporting market reforms: OUTA recommends restructuring Eskom and increasing competition within the energy sector to foster diversity and competition in energy supply.

OUTA’s detailed, data-driven response seeks to persuade Nersa to scrutinise Eskom’s approach, prioritise South African consumers, and ensure responsible regulation of electricity prices that balances economic stability with sustainable energy practices.

The background

Nersa received Eskom’s Multi-Year Price Determination application for the years 2025/26 to 2027/28 (MYPD6) in August, and called for comment in September on the application and a consultation paper, with a closing date of 1 November. Nersa is due to hold public hearings on the Eskom application from 18 November to 4 December, and expects to make a decision on it on 20 December. Nersa said the main drivers of the Eskom’s request for price increases were the cost of primary energy, operating costs, the cost of independent power producers (IPPs), international purchases and depreciation.

The Eskom MYPD6 application is calculated on a revenue requirement of R446 billion for the first year, then R495 billion and R537 billion for the subsequent years.

The increases follow two big increases for the last two years of 18.65% and 12.74%. This means the average price of electricity on the standard tariff has increased from 173.8 cents per kilowatt hour (c/kWh) in 2023/24 to 195.95c/kWh (2024/25) and, if Eskom’s application is granted, will increase further to 266.78c/kWh (2025/26) to 298.27c/kWh (2026/27) and to 325.4c/kWh (2027/28).

The price will also be affected by an increase due to Eskom’s Regulatory Clearing Account (RCA) application for 2021/22. On 30 July 2024, Nersa granted Eskom permission to claw back R8 billion from customers for under-recovery of costs during 2021/22 (Eskom asked for R24 billion); the way this will be added to the tariffs must still be finalised (see here and here). Eskom also submitted an RCA application for 2022/23, asking for R9 million (see here and here), and this is due to be finalised in December. Customers are currently still paying for the RCA decision of R3.5 billion for 2019/20, which is being liquidated over 2024/25 to 2026/27 (see here). Eskom applied for R11 billion for the RCA for 2020/21, but Nersa cut this down to a reduction by Eskom’s revenue for that year of R204 million (see here).

Source: OUTA 

Share.

Leave A Reply

About Author

Green Building Africa promotes the need for net carbon zero buildings and cities in Africa. We are fiercely independent and encourage outlying thinkers to contribute to the #netcarbonzero movement. Climate change is upon us and now is the time to react in a more diverse and broader approach to sustainability in the built environment. We challenge architects, property developers, urban planners, renewable energy professionals and green building specialists. We also challenge the funding houses and regulators and the role they play in facilitating investment into green projects. Lastly, we explore and investigate new technology and real-time data to speed up the journey in realising a net carbon zero environment for our children.

Copyright Green Building Africa 2024.