Johannesburg Stock Exchange slaps Eskom with R3 million fine for failing to comply with debt listings requirements

Google+ Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr +
  • South Africaโ€™s state-owned energy utility, Eskom, is listed as an issuer of debt securities on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE).
  • The JSE has slapped Eskom with a R3 million fine (suspended for three years) over its failure to comply timeously with stipulations of its debt listings requirements.
  • Specifically, Eskom has failed to disclose (i) dealings with board members and prescribed officers who are domestic prominent influential persons (โ€œDPIPsโ€), and (ii) loans and procurement with any related party, DPIPs and prescribed officers, as well as the related registers (collectively the โ€œpolicies and registersโ€), in accordance with paragraphs 7.9, 7.10, 7.15 and 7.16 of the Debt Listings Requirements (โ€œDLRsโ€)
  • The fine is wholly suspended for three years, provided Eskom isnโ€™t found to be in breach of similar provisions of the DLR’s during the suspension period.

In 2020, the JSE implemented specific rules for State-owned entities or municipalities governing the disclosure of policies and the treatment of domestic prominent influential persons and loans and procurement to related parties. According the JSE, following several delays and extension requests by Eskom since then, the entity had still not, by July 31, 2023, fulfilled its commitment to publish the relevant policies and registers.

โ€œDisclosing loans and procurement involving related parties is crucial. Transparent reporting allows noteholders to assess the fairness and integrity of these transactions. Failure to disclose such information deprives noteholders of crucial insights into potential risks and the issuerโ€™s true financial health,โ€ said the JSE in their SENS statement.

In a responding SENS announcement, Eskom acknowledges that it has not been fully compliant with the requirement to publish the policies and registers as required but wishes to point out the following:

  • in terms of Eskomโ€™s publicly available Memorandum of Incorporation (โ€œMOIโ€), Eskom is not permitted to advance loans to directors or prescribed officers and accordingly, no such transactions have taken place or would have needed to have been recorded in a register;
  • in terms of Eskomโ€™s Conflict of Interest Policy, which has been in effect and publicly available on Eskomโ€™s website since 18 July 2019, Eskom is restricted from doing any business and entering into any form of procurement contracts or transactions, with any directors, prescribed officers and any employees of Eskom. Accordingly, no such transactions have taken place or would have needed to have been recorded in a register;
  • in conjunction with the above, and when considering the period in review from 31 August 2020 (when the changes to the DLRs came into effect), there would have been no need for any disclosure in relation to loans to directors or prescribed officers nor would there be any procurement transactions with any directors or prescribed officers as these dealings are strictly prohibited by Eskomโ€™s MOI and Conflict of Interest Policy;
  • as far as Eskom is aware, it has not, during the period in review, received any inquiries from noteholders/stakeholders or any other market participant as to the policies and registers;
  • in the period in review, Eskom has accessed the market through its Note Programme on aย very limited number of occasions and in each instance has done so in response to specificย requests from existing sophisticated institutional investors; andย based on the above, Eskom is of the view that (i) no noteholders have been prejudiced byย Eskomโ€™s failure to publish the policies and registers, and (ii) from an information transparency standpoint, there would likely be minimal and immaterial anticipated consequences for applying these policies retrospectively.

Eskom adds that JSE sanction is for not timeously publishing the policies and registers, and in no way suggests any breach of the policies themselves.

โ€œEskom recognises the importance of effective governance and transparent disclosure for noteholder confidence. It has taken significant steps to rectify the non-compliance and to ensure that Eskom remains compliant going forward. The outstanding policies and registers (or appropriate statements) are now largely finalised and were published on the Eskom website on Friday, 12 April 2024 (policies) and Friday, 28 June 2024 (registers). In terms of Eskomโ€™s Politically Exposed Persons Policy dated 8 April 2024, Eskom initiated a process of informing the top 100 suppliers of the new requirement to identify and maintain a register of suppliers who fall within the categories identified in paragraph 7.15 of the DLRs. Eskom will publish the requisite register on or before 31 October 2024,โ€ said Eskom.

โ€œEskom is disappointed to have received a public censure and suspended fine from the JSE but is wholly committed to ensuring the entity complies with the DLRs and upholds the values and principles of good corporate governance,โ€ Eskom concluded.

Author: Bryan Groenendaal

Share.

Leave A Reply

About Author

Green Building Africa promotes the need for net carbon zero buildings and cities in Africa. We are fiercely independent and encourage outlying thinkers to contribute to the #netcarbonzero movement. Climate change is upon us and now is the time to react in a more diverse and broader approach to sustainability in the built environment. We challenge architects, property developers, urban planners, renewable energy professionals and green building specialists. We also challenge the funding houses and regulators and the role they play in facilitating investment into green projects. Lastly, we explore and investigate new technology and real-time data to speed up the journey in realising a net carbon zero environment for our children.

Copyright Green Building Africa 2024.