No questions allowed at Ninety One’s AGM due to ‘technical issues’

Google+ Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr +
  • Just Share has published a round-up of Ninety Oneโ€™s 2024 AGM which took place on 25 July.

Questions from Ninety One shareholders were not dealt with at the AGM. As a result, Just Share will be filing a complaint with the Companies and Intellectual Property Commission (CIPC) in terms of section 168(b) of the Companies Act, 2008, which provides that โ€œany person may file a complaint in writing with the Commission in respect of any provision of this Act โ€ฆ alleging that a person has acted in a manner inconsistent with this Act, or that the complainantโ€™s rights under this Act, or under a companyโ€™s Memorandum of Incorporation or rules, have been infringedโ€.

Related news:ย Ninety One was formed as Investec Asset Management in 1991. It changed its name to Ninety One in spring 2020 when it was demerged from Investec who is major payer in world’s biggest tax fraud. Read moreย 

Just Shareโ€™s complaint will be based on our contention that Ninety Oneโ€™s AGM failed to comply with the companyโ€™s clear obligations underย sectionsย 61(8)(d), 61(10)) and 63(2)ย of the Companies Act.

These sections provide (our emphasis):

  • That an annual general meeting convened in terms of section 61(7) of the Companies Actย must, at a minimum,ย provide for โ€œany matters raised by shareholders, with or without advance notice to the companyโ€,ย to be one of the items of businessย to be transacted;
  • That โ€œEvery shareholders meeting of a public companyย must be reasonably accessibleย within the Republic for electronic participation by shareholders in the manner contemplated inย section 63(2), irrespective of whether the meeting is held in the Republic or elsewhereโ€; and
  • That a company may provide for โ€œa shareholders meeting to be conducted entirely by electronic communicationโ€; or โ€œfor one or more shareholders โ€ฆ to participate by electronic communication in all or part of a shareholders meeting that is being held in person, as long as the electronic communication employed ordinarilyย enables all persons participating in that meeting to communicate concurrently with each other without an intermediary, and to participate reasonably effectively in the meetingโ€.

Ninety Oneโ€™s AGM clearly did not allow for any matters to be raised by shareholders; it was not reasonably accessible to shareholders in South Africa; and the electronic communication did not enable shareholders to participate.

By close of business on 25 July, Ninety One emailed Just Share to say that there was a โ€œtechnical issue during the AGM which resulted in the participants of the Ninety One Limited AGM being unable to ask questions during the meeting. Unfortunately, as we were only made aware of this issue once the AGM had concluded, we were unable to address the matter during the meetingโ€.

However, the AGM was conducted extremely quickly, with no opportunity given for any problems to be rectified. Ninety One should have been aware that there might well be questions from South African shareholders, but did not pause to ensure that the electronic platform was functioning properly when it appeared that no shareholders had questions. The entire Q&A session lasted less than two minutes – the whole meeting lasted about 11 minutes before it was split for voting.

Increasingly, shareholders are being prevented from exercising their rights at AGMs because of โ€œtechnical issuesโ€ that arise because of online AGM platforms. It is crucial for the CIPC to weigh in on the consequences of conducting an AGM which is non-compliant with the Companies Act due to โ€œtechnical failuresโ€, especially given the number of companies opting to host electronic-only AGMs.

Climate change resolution

Just Share voted against Ninety Oneโ€™s 2024 climate change resolution (Resolution 11). The resolution asked shareholders โ€œto approve the companyโ€™s climate strategyโ€. Ninety Oneโ€™s climate strategy lacks the specificity and ambition required to deliver real-world emission reductions. The climate strategy does not outline emission reduction pathways by asset class, nor does it set targets to reduce financed emissions in absolute terms.

Source: Just Shareย 

Share.

1 Comment

  1. Pingback: No questions allowed at Ninety One's AGM due to 'technical issues' - Just Share

Leave A Reply

About Author

Green Building Africa promotes the need for net carbon zero buildings and cities in Africa. We are fiercely independent and encourage outlying thinkers to contribute to the #netcarbonzero movement. Climate change is upon us and now is the time to react in a more diverse and broader approach to sustainability in the built environment. We challenge architects, property developers, urban planners, renewable energy professionals and green building specialists. We also challenge the funding houses and regulators and the role they play in facilitating investment into green projects. Lastly, we explore and investigate new technology and real-time data to speed up the journey in realising a net carbon zero environment for our children.

Copyright Green Building Africa 2024.